Engineering agents that ship real work.
Not a code-completion toy. An engineering agent reads the issue, explores the repo, drafts the fix, writes the tests, opens the pull request — and waits for a human to approve the merge.
Three jobs, done daily.
Each role is a job description turned into software, running inside your existing tools.
Pull-Request Drafter
Reads a scoped issue, explores the codebase, drafts a branch with the fix and tests, writes a clear PR description, and requests human review. Never merges on its own.
Issue Triage Agent
Labels new issues, links duplicates, asks reporters for missing reproduction steps, estimates scope, and routes to the right owner — keeping the backlog honest.
Test-Case Generator
Reads a diff or a spec and proposes unit, integration, and edge-case tests. Runs them in CI and reports coverage deltas to a reviewer.
First-Pass Code Reviewer
Checks PRs against your style guide, flags risky patterns, verifies tests exist, and leaves a structured review — a human still makes the call.
Docs Keeper
Notices when code changes make docs stale, drafts updates to READMEs and runbooks, and opens a docs PR alongside the code PR.
Dependency Watcher
Monitors dependency updates, reads changelogs, flags breaking changes, and drafts upgrade PRs in a sandbox branch.
How an engineering agent works a ticket.
Guardrails at every step. The human decides what ships.
Read
Ingest the issue, linked discussions, and relevant repo context.
Plan
Propose an approach and a task breakdown for a human to approve.
Draft
Write the code and tests in a sandboxed branch — never on main.
Verify
Run tests and linters in CI; iterate until green or escalate.
Review
Open the PR with a clear summary. A human reviews, requests changes, or merges.
Works inside your stack.
Every action is logged. Every merge requires a human.
Where it fits
COMPANY-SIZE FIT — Mid-market & enterprise. Engineering agents create the most leverage where there's a real backlog and a review culture — typically mid-market and enterprise teams with established repos, CI, and code-review norms.
Tools it uses
GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Jira, Linear, Slack, CI/CD (Actions, Circle, Buildkite), Sentry, Datadog, package registries.
Guardrails
Branch protection respected. No force-push. No secrets in logs. Sandboxed execution. Cost and time budgets per task. Signed commits where required.
Human checkpoints
Plan approval before code, PR review before merge, and escalation when confidence is low or the diff touches critical paths.
Engineering agent questions.
Will it merge code on its own?
No. Branch protection stays on. The agent drafts, tests, and opens pull requests — a human always reviews and merges.
What languages and frameworks does it support?
Any stack with a readable repo and a test runner. We've built agents for TypeScript, Python, Go, Rust, Java, and C# codebases, among others.
How does it handle secrets and credentials?
It never sees production secrets. Work runs in a sandbox with scoped, short-lived tokens. Every tool call is logged and auditable.
Can it work alongside our existing developers?
Yes — that's the point. It clears the routine queue (triage, tests, small fixes, docs) so your engineers spend time on architecture and judgment calls.
Clear your backlog this quarter.
Tell us your repo, your stack, and your definition of done. We'll propose an engineering agent scoped to your workflow.